Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||24 February 2017|
|PDF File Size:||5.23 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
With tears in her eyes, a children’s teacher reads in her field diary the scene that destabilized her: Interrogations are the right tool of a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not cease to make learning.
These are regularities that escape the evolutionist perspective, articulating “the discontinuity of regularities, the chance of their transformations, the materiality of their conditions of existence” p. This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: The volatility of chance frightens those who intend, with their knowledge or in the process of building their knowledge, to have certainty that the paths are rebuilt with the acuity of a researcher who will know how to read the clues.
By weaving practices and our look at them, that is, how we construct reality, an interrogation emerges to be worked out by shifting our experience of the patterns of truth and by opening ourselves to recognizing multiple prisms to deal with relationships.
For the latter, every act-fact is always reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis.
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Referring him to the school principal, which led to his suspension, had as an answer the boy’s revolt through the weapons he also had at hand: A writing that provokes movements and recomposes the scene reported through collective analyses makes us think that: As discussed by Coimbra and Nascimento”the implications analysis brings to the field of analysis feelings, perceptions, actions, events hitherto considered negative or strange, as deviations and errors The protagonism of the author of the diary is in the conduct of something that may have been understood as a particular situation, an action of a professional or a team, but it becomes a social event and historically referenced, even when loaded with singularities, because it was the analysis of their own implications.
It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the instihucional detach themselves from the identity perspective. The writing of a field diary from the perspective of institutional analysis is a collective practice, even when it is authorial. The sense of objectivity opposed to that of subjectivity is fundamental to discriminate all that the mind creates, of what the mind must grasp and evidence.
The process necessary to deconstruct the snalisis of the instituted is long, demanding from us the reinvention through practices lokrau intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world. It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications.
Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by sensation, instituciona, feeling, by silence, by desire, and any instutucional can participate. Concerned with the premise that the institutionalization of relationships legitimates their ways of functioning and, therefore, calls people to join them without questioning them, these authors propose both a conceptual analysis and a construction of techniques to subsidize a professional practice that makes the habits, the annoyances, the powerful silences and the whispers, into tools of intervention.
That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p. Foucault understands truth as a relation of power, differing unstitucional the act of looking at truth as something to be discovered and accepted, insofar as truth responds to a set of rules and procedures, which produce discourses.
Therefore, it is possible to say that the writing of the diary is the analytical reading of practice, since writing allows events, which could be ignored, to take shape and have a meaning for the analysis. Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can help to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as proposed by Durkheim.
Through this path, the disagreements in the working field emerge as analytical challenges and lead to the search for tools to intervene in ways throughout the professional ways takes place, in a collective exercise. Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice For almost twenty years we have been supervising internships in three distinct fields: Unlike the concept of “social fact” proposed by Durkheim, who grounds the positivist method, the field diary proposed by institutional analysis and in the light of Michel Foucault’s concept of event does not attribute any value to any episode, act and situation.
These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary. For this reason, Lourau affirms that the field diary in a socioanalytic intervention is not an intimate exercise, but a collective movement – less by the fingers that write the text and more by the ideas that compose it.
By this logic, an institution would be a historical form produced and reproduced by social practices that are becoming naturalized and that affirm truths that are instituted, codified, that create regulations and norms, losing their historical reference.
Namely, it is usually the first interview, the first contact, the speech of the first attended in each case that holds true as the story that has real force. What sustains a record of the social fact is its objectivity.
For this purpose, it operates with its own tools, among them the implication analysis and the field diary. In this field of possibilities, the supervision routes the analysis of what is recorded in the diary, highlighting, even, the displacements that this instrument causes from what happened.
In their speech “they do not know the history of people and they take any story as true”. What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth.
Methodologically, we conduct this work mainly through two references: The contents of the field diary could never be defined a priorinor could a schema or guideline be established, since this would be a pretension to guide the way of seeing, feeling, thinking, affecting, to signify the relationships at stake.
An important tool for carrying out the implication analysis is the field diary, which operates as a narrative of day-to-day intervention, historicizing it, rescuing it, potentializing it, in other words, enabling analysis by the act of writing.
ANÁLISIS INSTITUCIONAL by Maritza Valdez on Prezi
Coercion establishes a nexus between moral thinking and the penal meaning that leads to judgment. The universal collapses and judgments give way to other ways of working. From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted. In addition to being an authorial practice, the field diary is responsible for relationships because it produces events, by highlighting – with its densities and forms – what is recorded.
Criticizing would be to try to adjust a way to understand and act from certain ideas adopted as references and, in that sense, would have to be adopted by others. A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare.
In it, the professional doing is rebuilt not by accusations of failure, but by possible displacements in the exercise of collective thinking. Education without a previous shape? It is not a matter of recording successes, mistakes and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.
Criticism carries an intention of correction and adaptation. Next, the mother comes to the board demanding the child back.
Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political.